Sunday, April 26, 2009

Draw

Chessbase.com came up with this article about solving the perceived draw problems in chess.


A lot of "solutions" have already been proposed long ago. Some were even tried already. The most recent and widely used "solution" is the Sofia Rule.


The NCFP has already used this system in local tournaments. With success? I don't know. The success could only be measured by eradicating fixed games.


My own stand about draws in chess?


Draw is beautiful and sometimes even more satisfying than a win. A drawn game fought with the finest precision and strongest nerve over the board is more exciting than a lopsided win.


Just look at this game:



Discouraging a draw is something futile and stupid. Discouraging a draw will only do chess more harm than good.


So what must be done?


The main focus should be on eradicating fixed games and cheating – not on “combating the draw.”


In fact, a lot more pressing issues need more attention such as giving more incentives to chess players, attending to their welfare during tournaments, raising tournament prizes, etc.


I doubt that “combating the draw” could lure sponsors and advertisers. That’s foolish. The best way to lure the sponsors is to play best chess – as simple as that.


0 Comments: